Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
The Book Maven   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (6)


Speaking Truth to Tell-All
May 7, 2008

I was completely confused last week by Barbara Walters' "confession" about her decades-old (and cold) affair Cover Imagewith then-Massachusetts Senator Edward Brooke, a married man. Why was this tiny piece of information newsworthy? Because Brooke is African-American? Because he was the great love of the famed newswoman's life? If the former, it seems a bit stale; if the latter, a bit flat -- after all, she hasn't been gushing to Oprah about the one that got away or telling Cindy Adams that she's never been the same since her time with Brooke. 

Rather, she's spun the inclusion of Brooke as an example of her actually having a personal life, describing how she knew she'd have to tell him: "...he's very private," and that she "sent him a note. Handwritten." I find that "Handwritten" so poignant. I realize Walters was underscoring just how Important and Personal this was to her; to me, it just underscores how little personal life she must have had during her busiest decades in the spotlight. Why does she feel the need to let us know that she actually put pen to paper in telling Brooke about her tell-all?

I see it as a calculated move to soften her career-driven persona -- after all, she wants fans of The View to buy Head Butlerthe book. Over at Head Butler, Jesse Kornbluth offers a different take, one that acknowledges Walters as spinmistress, but also examines the act as betrayal:

If Walters' indiscretion caused nothing more than a few unhappy days in Edward Brooke's life, I wouldn't care so much. But I see something bigger here. “There is no 'off the record,'” Hunter Thompson said, and maybe the alcoholic stoner wiseass was right... The notion, at the very top of the food chain, that respecting the privacy of others is for fools? That's recent. Walters dropping a dime on Edward Brooke legitimizes the worst sort of personal revelation: gotcha journalism of the bedroom kind.

Kornbluth concludes "I find this sad." I do, too. I haven't read Audition, and it may be that however much of it deals with Walters and Brooke (a paragraph? a chapter?) is integral to the memoir. However, I wonder two things. First, if Walters was so concerned with Brooke's privacy and reaction, why didn't she contact him prior to her book's publication? Second, why highlight a "very private" person's reaction in promoting the book?

I think I'm still confused.



Posted by Bethanne Patrick on May 7, 2008 | Comments (6)


May 7, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
Christine S. commented:

Bethanne, I TOTALLY agree with you.




May 7, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
Saggia commented:

If she didn't include it, and it was later revealed, then the veracity of her memoir would be called into question. As to her stating, "handwritten," given the use of computers, I usually write most notes to friends and love ones on the computer, mostly because it's faster and my handwriting can be hard for other's to read (it's clear as a bell to me, though!). If I wrote something to someone handwritten, it would be something that would set it apart from other correspondence in it's intimacy. This is just my opinion, but it's looking at the story with a different, less critical, perspective.




May 8, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
joanie commented:

One article I read says she was earning twelve million a year. When is enough enough, monetarily or attention-wise? She could have written about her family, her interviews, etc. without trashing Star, Rosie, and especially without the affair.




May 8, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
JoAnn commented:

There is a stark contrast between the classy journalists who have published memoirs - Walter Cronkite, Bob Schieffer, Ben Bradlee, Katherine Graham - and Barbara Walters. Her memoir is tabloid fodder compared to the others. Some things are better left unsaid. Where is the honor in hurting other people? And BW has the audacity to say that she was not a m because she was not being kept! She should look at the dictionary, which defines "mistress" as "a woman having an extramarital relationship, esp. with a married man".




May 10, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
Lily commented:

Never was a Walters fan, but it's the story of her life, right? She's welcome to tell it and let the chips fall where they may. One reason for talking might be to show that she could do something nobody thought she could. And get away with it. After all, her career has been full of "you can't do this" situations. I am not justifying adultery, however. As for money, is there some rule that she isn't allowed to make as much money as, say, greedy Donald Trump? Who has displayed far too much of his personal life for the world to see? Don't think so.




May 27, 2008
In response to: Speaking Truth to Tell-All
writeroffthelake commented:

I don't usually read memoirs because I don't want to know the intimate details of anyone's life. It's their life, not mine, and it makes me too uncomfortable being privy to information that I have no need to know. Say I just don't have the curiosity gene if you want, but I'll stick to reading fiction where I don't have to be embarrassed about learning something about a real person that I shouldn't know.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements



VIRTUAL EDITION


Virtual Edition



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites